Number of accused |
Defendants: Fazli Ajdari Idriz Aliju Rexhep Aliju Sadik Aliju Burim Fazliju Faton Hajdari Ferat Hajdari Samet Hajdari Ramadan Halimi Ahmet Hasani Nazif Hasani Agush Memishi Šefqet Musliju Shemsi Nuhiju Shaqir Shaqiri Selimon Sadiku Kamber Sahiti |
Ranking the Accused |
Defendants' ranks: Middle military (Fazli Ajdari) Lower military (all others) |
Indictment date |
11. August 2009. years |
Case Phase |
Case status: finally resolved |
Duration of the procedure from the beginning of the trial |
5 years 3 months |
Number of examined witness |
82 |
Date and outcome of the first instance verdict |
21. January 2011. years |
Date and outcome of the decision of the Appellate Court |
6. January 2012. years |
Date and outcome of the verdict in the repeated trial |
5. September 2012. years |
Criminal offence |
Criminal offence: war crime against civilian population, art. 142 (1) in re art. 22 (coperpetration), FRY Criminal Act |
Factual description |
Background facts: Charges against the 17 accused - ethnic Albanians from the Preševo/Bujanovac area and former members of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) - included the killing of 80 civilians and unlawful arrests of an undetemined number of victims who were then submitted to torture, maltreatment or rape. The victims were mostly Serbs, as well as some Roma and Albanian civilians suspected of being disloyal to the KLA. The crimes were allegedly committed in the period from mid-June to the end of 1999, in the so-called KLA Karadak operational zone in Kosovo (municipalities Gnjilane, Vitina, Kosovska Kamenica and Novo Brdo). |
Procedural remarks |
Procedural remarks: The initial indictment included 17 accused individuals. Proceedings against eight of them were suspended due to their unavailability to the Serbian authorities; two were arrested prior to repeated trial; the remaining seven were tried in absentia for the first time in the course of repeated proceedings, and they were acquitted of all charges. Following the trial completion, on 5 December 2014, the Supreme Court of Cassation (SCC) adopted the Prosecutor's request for the protection of legality. The SCC found that the Higher and Appellate Courts' decisions were in breach of essential provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, this SCC finding had no effect on the case outcome, given that decisions upon requests for the protection of legality may not prejudice the accused persons' interests. |